Category Archives: Uncategorised

Britain help fight for Taiwan? It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad

Article published in The Daily Telegraph, 28 July 2025. © Richard Kemp

If Britain wants to be taken seriously on the world stage, it would do better to build up its defence capabilities than make empty threats to China. Yesterday in Australia, Defence Secretary John Healey declared that Britain would be ready to fight if a conflict breaks out over Taiwan. In other words, if China invades Taiwan, which is a distinct possibility. President Xi has made it clear he intends to bring the country under Chinese rule and has not excluded the use of force. Indeed, Beijing has been preparing for exactly that for years.

Speaking from the deck of HMS Prince of Wales, Healey said deterrence was achieved by securing ‘peace through strength’. He’s right about that, but deterrence is based on actual military strength, not mere words. Britain no longer has anything close to the military power it needs, and certainly not sufficient to fight a war in the Pacific, even alongside allies. It’s one thing to dock an aircraft carrier in Darwin and sail freedom of navigation patrols through the benign Taiwan Strait. It is quite another to engage in combat against a nuclear-armed power with the largest army and navy in the world.

For that matter, despite the value for diplomacy and national prestige of a series of flag-waving tours around the Pacific, would it not be better to deploy the HMS Prince of Wales to confront Chinese-sponsored aggression in the Red Sea? For almost two years, the Houthis have been harassing and attacking international shipping there, yet both our carriers have been kept safely away. Earlier in the year a British tanker was set on fire by a Houthi missile and the next month a British cargo vessel had to be abandoned after it was hit. Having sunk two ships so far this month, the Houthis vowed yesterday to step up their attacks.

The Houthis’ aggression is supported by the regime in Beijing, which supplies them with parts for missiles and drones as well as software and satellite intelligence for targeting ships. Instead of dealing with this present threat and sending a real deterrent message to China, we are pulling our last remaining frigate out of the region, to return home to the scrapyard. That will leave just a solitary minesweeper in Bahrain, with no other warships available.

That’s hardly surprising. The once mighty Royal Navy surface fleet is now down to 14 frigates and destroyers, of which only around half are available at any time, plus the two carriers. After decades of cuts, the Army and Royal Air Force are in an equally enfeebled state. In view of this, Healey’s words are unlikely to give Beijing’s political leaders or military planners furrowed brows never mind cause them to re-think their planned aggression. Nor will the recent defence review’s findings. Against the new Nato benchmark requiring 5 per cent of GDP to be spent on defence, the Government has said it will increase to 2.5 per cent by the end of this parliament with less-than-convincing assurances of an increase to 3.5 per cent by 2034.

Healey’s promised ‘peace through strength’ requires not only military but also political strength. Starmer’s ‘coalition of the willing’ plans to deploy UK ground forces to Ukraine now seem to have evaporated altogether and we don’t have the resolve necessary to defend our own shores from rubber boat flotillas. Even if we had the wherewithal to fight the Chinese, our Government would no more send British sailors to meet their fate in the Pacific than to send infantrymen to fight and die in Eastern Europe. And don’t think Xi Jinping doesn’t know it.

Image: Nato/Flickr

There are no ‘journalists’ in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives

Article published in The Daily Telegraph, 10 June 2025. © Richard Kemp

Britain and the world’s views of the rights and wrongs of the Gaza war are so often shaped by what the BBC reports. That’s mattered more than ever in recent weeks, amid the feverishly heated coverage of Israel’s new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) scheme to deliver aid to the Palestinian people and bypass allegedly Hamas-controlled NGOs.

Hamas-linked sources claim Israeli soldiers have repeatedly shot and killed Palestinian civilians waiting for GHF food with their families. Stories bearing the bylines of BBC ‘journalists’ in Gaza largely tell this version of events, albeit including the denials of the IDF.

News organisations using Gazan reporters say they have no choice, given the IDF’s refusal to allow in outside journalists.

But that’s no reason not to exercise care and employ the same editorial standards as they would on any other story.

For critics of the BBC, the results have been a disaster for the Corporation and its standards.

They point to the stories that have not been told, or have been largely overlooked, by these reporters almost throughout the war: of Hamas’s tyranny over the people of Gaza, its torture and murder of opponents, and of the courageous Palestinians who defy its rule.

And why is there such scant coverage of Hamas using the civilian population as a human shield by placing tunnels under civilian buildings and military bases in hospital?

Where are the stories of Israeli hostages being moved across Gaza?

Why is there no footage of Hamas firing rockets or their gunmen on the move?

There is an obvious answer: it appears that these reporters are either pro-Hamas, or too afraid of reprisals from terrorist gunmen to tell the truth.

It is a charge that BBC Global News Director Jonathan Munro entirely rejects.

Almost spluttering in disbelief recently at the suggestion that ‘some of the people you’re using in Gaza might be under pressure, might be restricted in what Hamas allows them to see’, resulting in a ‘partial view’, he insisted: ‘There’s no restriction on what they can see, what they can show and what they can film when they’re on location.

‘There’s no suggestion at all that any of those very brave people are under any political influence.’

Munro’s denial shows an astonishing disregard for the well-documented reality of life in Gaza.

Take a recent report from the well regarded NGO the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). It tears apart the notion that press freedom exists in Gaza.

According to the CPJ, journalists there have been subject to ‘detentions, assaults, obstruction and raids’ going back to the start of Hamas rule almost twenty years ago.

While detailing numerous violent assaults on members of the press in Gaza, the analysis warns that violations by Hamas are ‘underreported’.

Some journalists who have been assaulted are believed to be too afraid to say anything at all; others have gone to the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS) but say they do not want to go public for fear of retaliation.

Note that both the CPJ and PJS are the staunchest critics of Israel. There can be no doubting the credibility and accuracy of their accounts on this matter. The picture they paint is light years removed from Munro’s suggestion of unencumbered press freedom in Gaza.

Some of the journalists in Gaza used by the BBC have been exposed as having deeply hateful views of Israel and Jews, making them entirely unsuitable as journalists.

Yet there is a problem that goes far beyond any individual, if Munro and other executives cannot understand the reality of reporting from Gaza.

TV producer Leo Pearlman has proposed the solution: ‘The BBC make a huge deal of adding to every news script from Gaza by saying that Israel doesn’t allow independent access for journalists.

‘What it never says – and maybe should start doing – is that no journalist can operate freely in Gaza under Hamas control.’

Until they start doing so, Munro and his fellow BBC executives are not only deceiving audiences but also themselves.

We’re betraying our Armed Forces’ sacrifices

Article published in The Daily Telegraph, 26 December 2021. © Richard Kemp

Even during military operations that catch the media spotlight – such as the deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq – at Christmas time too few people think of the men and women of the Armed Forces, risking their lives away from their families. This year, however, many will not even be aware that about 4,000 British troops are deployed across the world defending our interests, from the Falkland Islands to the Persian Gulf, from Mali to Estonia. That’s on top of the thousands on standby in Britain to, for example, support the fight against Covid.

My own battalion – 1st Royal Anglians – is on operations in Cyprus. That might sound like an idyllic place to spend Christmas, but most of these men and women will have been carrying out round-the-clock security duties. Others, confined to barracks or the immediate area, will have been on high readiness to react to crises across the Middle East and North Africa.

Christmas in the Armed Forces is the best of times and the worst of times. Troops on active operations are surrounded by their mates, in high spirits and often carrying out the dangerous duties they signed up for. Under the ethos ‘Serve to Lead’, commanders do everything possible to help them celebrate – unless a battle is underway. Traditionally the troops have been brought ‘gunfire’ in bed by their officers. This is an aptly named cocktail of tea and rum that has always had mixed reviews, even in the trenches at the Somme.

By ancient custom, lunch is served to the troops by the officers, warrant officers and sergeants. I suspect the food fights that ensued in the past are frowned on these days. Aboard some Royal Navy warships an ordinary seaman becomes captain for the day, issuing orders to his shipmates.

My brigade commander in the Saudi desert on the eve of the 1991 invasion of Iraq ordered that no soldier stand guard duty or fatigues Continue reading